El Moro unauthorized trail closure

Discussion in 'Ride Reports' started by Chopper, May 23, 2008.

  1. dirtvert

    dirtvert Whine on!

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,667
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    elementary school teacher
    Location:
    A small town in France
    okay...Laguna Coast and El Moro were designed as multi-use parks: hiking, mtb, and equestrian. but with an overriding goal of preservation (permanently, unless arnold decides to put another toll road through). they will never have housing developments.

    i would suggest that people, if they already haven't, take the time to go through the new nix center on the 133 (it's free) and talk to some of the volunteers. most of them worked hard for many years-and the city of laguna beach taxed themselves- to preserve laguna coast from development. it's a unique and, with our increasing amount of fires, an endangered ecosystem that we're lucky to be able to play in.
     
  2. KeepsWhatHappens

    KeepsWhatHappens Warriors Society Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,557
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Photographer
    Location:
    RSM
    Home Page:
    Some of my friends give me alot of sh!t when I refuse to ride illegal horse trails in O'Neill. I tell them I'd like to set a good example and I have a reputation (as a Warriors society member) to uphold. But they are too shallow to understand and just are being dicks. How should I deal with them?
     
  3. el cap

    el cap Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,810
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    SC/Palm Springs
    Don't give in... ride the other way!

    [​IMG]
     
  4. JamR

    JamR Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2005
    Messages:
    926
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Senior Planning & Field Operations Manager
    Location:
    San Juan Capistrano
    IMO, it basically comes down to the quality of the friends and the friendship. I would not call someone who gives you sh#t for not riding illegal trails with them a friend.

    I have friends that I know who ride some non-sanctioned trails and we discuss it periodically when we talk. They don't agree with my position and I don't agree with theirs; however we don't disrespect each other or give each other sh#t.

    They know where I stand so they never put me in the position of having to peel off from the ride while they take a non-authorized route.

    Basically you should not have to deal with them at all.

    If they don't have enough respect for you to not give you Sh#t for doing something they know is wrong (especially if they already know your position)......I would not really consider them friends.

    Friends don't have to agree on everyting, but they should have mutual respect for each others position even if it's a totally opposite point of view.

    Just my .02
     
  5. BullitEater

    BullitEater New Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2008
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Telonix

    Telonix is still not part of the park and you sound like you would like the trail closed. If you have ridden the trail lately you would see the trail is in great shape. This through the efforts of riders who like riding great tech trails. Countless man-hours were spent this last year getting this trail back to it's previous glory. If you don't like and/or can't appreciate this trail or others like it keep it to yourself. FYI this trail is one of the oldest not in the park and has much history to it. Leave it alone.

     
  6. art23rockpile

    art23rockpile Minus Delta T

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2008
    Messages:
    3,479
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Cabinet/Furniture/Door Maker
    Location:
    Laguna Beach
    For what it's worth...

    Just because something's legal, it doesn't mean it's right.
    And just because something's illegal, it does not make it wrong.

    The trail mentioned IS in good shape, due to the efforts of those who volunteer their time. I have a number of friends who ride it, and personally see nothing wrong in their doing so. Also, I see no indication that JamR wants the trail eradicated. Neither one of these issues is relevant at the moment.

    Adam brings up a valid point: if people feel so strongly about this trail, why hasn't anyone taken on the 'dirty work' of trying to get it legalised?

     
  7. JamR

    JamR Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2005
    Messages:
    926
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Senior Planning & Field Operations Manager
    Location:
    San Juan Capistrano
    I guess you did not read all of my post.

    I already said it's not part of the park......but the property has been purchased by the Laguna Canyon Foundation and is part of the protected Laguna Greenbelt, and will probably become part of the park in the future. This is a simple reality and a fact of life.....nothing less.

    Also please don't put words in my mouth or make assumptions.....I would like to see Telonics on the legal map, but it's not going to get there by complacency, whining, or complaining.

    Just trying to point out that if and when it becomes part of the park, it may be closed; and the people who have sat idly by for more than a decade, and have not attended any meetings.....nor lifted a finger to try to get it on the map should not have a right to complain.

    This is not a secret trail and its future is not certain by any means.....and I guarantee that a day will come when its presence will be on the decision block. Just another fact of life that will not go away.

    People have known for more than a decade that one day there would be decisions made on many local trails to either bring them into the system or close them as things change (like incorporation into county, state, or city areas).

    My point again is simple, and I don't understand why people seem to get so upset at this message......if you like Telonics.....then get involved and work to get it on the map. It simply will not exist forever in its current state. Eventually as the property changes management....the trail will need to be addressed. This is just a fact of life.

    People cannot just bury their heads in the sand and make believe that the trail will not be questioned in the future.

    I guess my biggest question to the people who love this trail is why the resistance against working to get it legalized? Why wait till the eleventh out just to get all worked up......because the eleventh hour is coming sooner or later.

    Again....I would like to see Telonics legalized, but I can't bury my head from reality that it may not happen if users don't get involved.

    I guess my big question here is....why are the passionate people here not working to get the trail on the map?

    I'm Really curious about that?????

    I'm just pointing out that if people just sit back and do nothing......one of these days you may see a post about Telonics that starts just like this post started.....with the news that the managers went out and eliminated the trail. Then everyone will be all up in arms like they had no clue that this would happen.

    There have been more than 10 years of warnings and with the change in ownership of the property......the trails status is one step closer to some sort of decision.

    Just get involved.......that all I've been saying for years.

    Again....this trail is no secret. The Aliso-Woods RRMP documents do show all of the trails that migrate down to the canyon even in the parcels not managed by the park....because part of the RRMP process is to inventory all of the trails both in the existing park and in the adjacent connecting areas. You can clearly see the Telonics alignment on the map of trails and it is shown as "unauthorized".

    Again.....I'm simply pointing out that this issue is not just going to go away. Just like Laguna Coast has reviewed all their trails, the City of Irvine Has reviewed all their trails, the State is obviously checking their trails (and beginning to close some).....Aliso-Woods is in currently in the process of their RRMP....which does not encompass Telonics.....but again, that may change in the future.

    I basically try to deal with facts and reality as they exist, and Telonics is facing a reality that will not solve itself.

    Get involved
     
  8. Patrick

    Patrick Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2008
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    Real Estate Expert
    Location:
    SJC
    I respect your point and your passion is what we need to protect our trails.
    I believe that Telonics could never be made public because it ends on private property. If there were some legal "exit" maybe. If this trail were to be brought up before a committee, it would be officially marked illegal because they would have to summon the land owners at the end. They are tolerant of the few that exit the trail now because it's a relatively small # or folks. No offence, but if this trail were to be legalized you would have every jack ass in darth vader body armor blowing down the trail until someone died and then it would be closed anyway. The uncertainty kind of acts as a deterrent now
     
  9. JamR

    JamR Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2005
    Messages:
    926
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Senior Planning & Field Operations Manager
    Location:
    San Juan Capistrano
    It's not unheard of instances where trails enter or exit through private property.....it does take planning, easements, waivers, etc...but not impossible.

    The issue is that Telonics will be on the bubble, because regardless of the private holdings at the bottom: the other slope areas are now part of protected area, and people cannot just ignore it. It's an issue that is simply not going to disappear....and if people do nothing....it will be closed for sure, and put under a restoration plan, monitored, and enforced.

    I understand your points, but they won't change the realityof the situation.

    Would people rather have Telonics with possibly more traffic, or no Telonics at all?

    People got involved and worked for additional trails, and some of them have become a reality.....it can definitely happen.....but to do nothing will absolutely guarantee failure.

    I definitely understand that many people believe that if they ask for a particular trail; their concern is that it will bring that trail to light and cause its closure by the various managers.........but all of the trails in this area that are not part of the managed systems will be eventually closed anyway since they are not secrets by any means.

    It may be too late for some while others may still have a chance......but people will never know unless they get involved and ask.

    If people really care about any particular trail, they should be getting involved.
     
  10. maxwell

    maxwell Dirty Stinky PATH Love

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    3,448
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    CRASH TEST DUMMY $#%&*^#
    Location:
    Tustin
    Home Page:
    JamR, you've got PM.
     
  11. RFXIbibisTom

    RFXIbibisTom Wow, how Rad!

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2007
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Cat

    Thanks, and I should have mentioned that as I was ACTUALLY out there on the day the CAT destroyed Cholla.
    When I asked the guy what he was doing he told me he was trying to get up to the fire road. He didn't know you could go around on the street. HE WASN'T IN UNIFORM ALTHOUGH I HAVE SEEN RANGERS BEHIND THE WHEEL OF A CAT BEFORE.

    Whatever the case may be, it seems very hypocritical for the powers that be to be upset about NEW TRAILS being built.

    The deliverance thing really ticks me off in that the Rangers had the FIRE DEPT. come in and do it. To pay all those firemen overtime is expensive. IF THEY WANTED IT OUT, THEY SHOULD HAVE DONE IT THEMSELVES. (they being the Rangers)

    Our state has a HUGE shortage of cash for FIRE, POLICE and of course EDUCATION. I have staff members at my school that have been RIFFED due to the lack of funds for next year. NOT COOL.
     
  12. el cap

    el cap Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,810
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    SC/Palm Springs
    Tom, I 100% agree with you. Why pay someone to block a trail when the teachers at my school are getting RIFFed, too. Where do their priorities lie? :-k It looks like the education funding gets hacked first. #-o
     
  13. maxwell

    maxwell Dirty Stinky PATH Love

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    3,448
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    CRASH TEST DUMMY $#%&*^#
    Location:
    Tustin
    Home Page:
    This whole disscusion reminds me a little of a song I know...........

    "Before you judge me take a look at you
    Can't you find something better to do
    Point the finger, slow to understand
    Arrogance and ignorance go hand in hand

    It's not who you are it's who you know
    Others lives are the basis of your own
    Burn your bridges build them back with wealth
    Judge not lest ye be judged yourself

    Holier than thou
    You are
    Holier than thou
    You are

    You know not"

    This is just how I feel, and is not aimed at anyone in particular.

    I'm all for trying to get certain trails "legalized", and am willing go try and do what it takes to make it happen.
    But what WILL end up happening if they do become legit, is what has happened to Stairsteps & T&A since they were marked as "open" trails.

    And that my friend's will be a sad day!
     
  14. bcs

    bcs New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2007
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Totally agree about responsibility, and not riding closed areas. But if these guys are so supportive of us, then instead of closing an "unauthorized" trail, why don't they figure out what paperwork they have to do to "authorize" its use?
     
  15. Crystal Cove RSM

    Crystal Cove RSM New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2008
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hello STR community. . .

    Hey!

    Just wanted to introduce myself. My name is Dominic and I'm with the Resource Management (Environmental Restoration) crew here at Crystal Cove / El Morro.

    Once removal of the trails began, we were pretty sure that there had to be some e-uproar somewhere.

    I haven't had the time to read through the whole thread yet, I wanted to introduce myself.

    As someone who has grown up riding bikes (ABA racing as a little kid, long time MTb'r and more recently a road cyclist) I totally understand and empathize with some of the frustration with the State Park's actions.

    There is quite a bit of misinformation here. I can assure you that no Ranger ever drove a CAT up any single track and there was no time where we had "the fire department" working to remove trails. (CDF Fire crew is a prison-release program - as well as being a very cost effective/frugal use of our State's resources, they generally fight large wilderness fires and only work in the parks during the winter and low-fire-threat weather conditions)


    I will finish reading it and try and respond to/explain everyone's complaints and problems as soon as I can.


    I also want to extend Crystal Cove's sincerest thanks to those members of this community that are taking the time to explain to others how important preservation of California's wilderness areas really is.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 19, 2008
  16. 2wheel_lee

    2wheel_lee Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2006
    Messages:
    7,341
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    North Orange County
    I don't know. Perhaps you're right that no ranger drove a CAT up Cholla. That being the case, the rangers poorly manage the heavy equipment used in their park. All the possible explanations point back to incompetence on behalf of the rangers and/or those who manage the trails.
     
  17. CalEpic

    CalEpic member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,719
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Laguna Niguel
    Maybe not a Ranger, but wasn't Ticketron bulldozed a little while back? I could be wrong since a few brain cells have been deleted in the last couple years.

    Thanks for taking the time to respond to the thread.

    C

    Lee - I think you already know this, but Cholla is in Aliso - a county park. El Moro is a State Park with different management. But your point is valid.

    C
     
  18. mr.hobbs

    mr.hobbs New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Messages:
    1,022
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Solid Gold dancer by night. Green Peace chairman b
    Location:
    Murrieta
    I remember when this happened. it wasn't a ranger. It was an indepentant contractor that was rebuilding the fire road below Cholla after a major rain storm. The driver took it upon himself to try and go up Cholla instead of finding a key for the gate to MILF park. If I remember at the time the rangers where outraged. Thus Cholla began it's down fall of not being a single track any longer. This was around 2000-2001.
     
  19. Crystal Cove RSM

    Crystal Cove RSM New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2008
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I can only speak to the operation of Crystal Cove SP in the time that I've been here. I'm not the resident "expert" of our group - but i will try and explain our department's position.


    Rangers dont manage any heavy equipment in any park. State licensed heavy equipment operators do that.

    There is a big difference between "incompetence" and "resource constraints" - When i have the time, i'll do my best to properly explain the man power and funding context we're working within here at Resource Management.

    Also, simply operating "a CAT" in an area like the Crystal Cove backcountry doesn't constitute poor operation. Big earth-moving machinery is used fairly often in the restoration of native natural habitat, it just has to be used carefully. . .heavy machinery and tractors are pretty much the only way of performing any kind of fire road maintenance or and major invasive weed removal (think fields of Mustard) or Water drainage/erosion control. If you saw a heavy machine IN the park, chances are it is working on mowing large patches of Mustard or False Broam which we are trying to replace with Coastal Sage Scrub. (We have had a report of unauthorized use of a Bobcat in the park, by a trail-builder?) You also would be really surprised at how quickly the mustard would over-grow the fire roads by which you access the single track trail heads.

    Point being, we use these machines very responsibly with the native habitat preservation as our number one priority.

    Just because they're larger and potentially more destructive machines than your mountain bike or shovel, they don't cause as many problems (not just geo-physical, endangered wildlife, too).

    I'm actually off the clock today, I will try and go through this thread possibly over the weekend and properly address everyone's issues. If there are any other questions, please post them here and i'll try my best to answer them later.
     
  20. xhuskr

    xhuskr Powered by Guinness

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    2,656
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Teacher (da wee ones)
    Location:
    Seal Beach
    Thnx for your input on the these matters, I hope to read more from your point of view as well as others.:)
     

Share This Page

Help keep STR alive, please click the donation button below