President Obama may declare San Gabriel Mountains a national monument

Discussion in 'The Pub' started by xtremeMTB, Aug 27, 2014.

  1. xtremeMTB

    xtremeMTB Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2009
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    18
  2. AKAlan

    AKAlan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2007
    Messages:
    358
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    Film Payroll Accountant
    Location:
    North Hollywood
    According to this article on Modern Hiker, US Chief Forester Tom Tidwell stated that all motorized and non-motorized recreation would still be allowed. That's about as specific as it gets though.
     
  3. RustyIron

    RustyIron Rob S.

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2007
    Messages:
    1,936
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    La Habra
    Home Page:
    The government can't manage what they already have.
    Their typical plan is to develop wilderness and restrict visitors.
    This cannot bode well for those of us who currently enjoy the freedom of hiking and biking in the hills.
     
  4. g-dub

    g-dub Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2007
    Messages:
    573
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Probably neutral to mtb as a practical matter.

    The wilderness areas are already at the highest level of restriction and the monument designation mostly restricts things like mining or collecting.

    I thinK this is mostly just civic boosterism. I don't think the park service would support the full park designation and the restrictions that come with it, and that's something that requires congress anyway. And there are interdepartmental rivalries to consider--transferring the land from usfs to nps would get testy.
     
  5. bing!

    bing! Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2010
    Messages:
    3,220
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    trail building up there is now elevated to the level of a felony. not that illegal trail building isnt already, uh, illegal :)
     
  6. Formu1fan

    Formu1fan Slow Down, Slower Up

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2010
    Messages:
    943
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    Environmental Scientist
    Location:
    Eureka CA
    I'm thinking it to be neutral as well. Fort Ord is a national monument and there's biking there.

    Plus, there isn't a real issue with transfer as national monuments can be managed by other agencies like BLM or the USFS
     
  7. evdog

    evdog Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2007
    Messages:
    904
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    San diego
    Lots of other monuments allow biking. The concern I have, as I understand this process is that designating a National Monument would trigger a requirement to develop a new management plan for the monument within a certain number of years. There is always a risk during that process that we would lose access to more trails. The frustrating thing is we have just gone through such a process as the four SoCal National Forests were forced to revise their management plans after environmental groups won a lawsuit a couple years ago. That process has resulted in a lot more recommended wilderness, and also change from backcountry classification to backcountry non-motorized for significant areas. Every new effort to "protect" national forests seems to restrict use. In some areas the forests are getting loved to death (or outright abused) so the protection is warranted. But in reality what would go a lot further to protecting the forests is for funding to be restored to the Forest Service so they can actually do their jobs.
     
  8. AKAlan

    AKAlan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2007
    Messages:
    358
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    Film Payroll Accountant
    Location:
    North Hollywood

Share This Page

Help keep STR alive, please click the donation button below