STR | SocalTrailRiders.org
Your Southern California
Mountain Biking Community
|
|||||||
| The Workshop Get and give help on repairs, installations, maintenance, and general bike tech. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
God doesn't love Favre??
![]() |
Don't shift ![]()
__________________
Painfreak: "With that headline I thought we were going to see CC riding in the buff or something along those lines. That's very misleading ."PacMan: "I always love the view of you looking over your shoulder." |
|
|
| post thanked by: |
andino (03-12-2007)
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
dirt tastes funny
|
lol but that's boring and it's extra weight
. I'm a bit of a weight weenie :P ![]() also do you need new cranks or can you modify the XT crankset for a single chain ring?
__________________
Last edited by andino; 03-12-2007 at 08:26 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Ski Bum
|
I think your best bet would be something like the Pauls Melvin chain tensioner. It has enough pull to use a double ring setup, so a full sus. would be no problem. Keep in mind that chain growth will be the big issue. Too much and you will either pop chains(most likely) or possibly damage the sus. linkages.
Yes, you can keep your XT cranks. You will just substitute the chainrings for a SS (non-ramped) ring in the middle ring position. PAUL MELVIN CHAINTENSIONER at JensonUSA.com Last edited by b-rad!; 03-12-2007 at 08:35 PM. Reason: added link |
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
WTFO
![]() |
running a FS frame as a SS is tricky, especially with a stumpjumper design. the chain tension will fluctuate with the suspension movement. so you would probably need a spring loaded tensioner (something w/ 2 pulleys), or a derailleur to keep the chain on.
Most people running FS/SS are the style where the whole chainstay/BB area is one piece, and the linkages are above, that way the distance between the BB and the rear dropout remains constant throughout the suspension travel. (think GT i-drive or the maverick style) yes you can use XT cranks for a single ring |
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Professional Lion Tamer
|
The path of the suspension on a stumpy should mean there is very little change in chain tension. And the bonus is you dont get such a beating on the downhills - Hmmmm I wonder if I should convert mine........LOL!
__________________
"I once met three guys named pain, suffering and sacrifice. Now, we're inseperable. We're best friends" |
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Over the Hill
![]() |
Any hill over 8% and I am out of the saddle on my singlespeed. Having owned both singlespeed hardtails and fully rigid singlespeeds, I much prefer the fully rigid. I would not welcome the loss of climbing power due to either the front or rear suspension...or even worse both. Yes I know you can lock the fork out and yes bikes can be pedal bob free but at the cost of more weight. The lighter you get that bike the more fun it will be to ride.
Dean
__________________
If I'm not lost or getting bushwacked, the trail was too easy. Prescott Valley Houses The Path |
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Bikes don't kill bunnies
|
Just put the single speed kit on the rear (cog and spacers) then use your existing derailleur as a tensioner. You'll probably need longer travel limit screws so that you can lock the deraileur inline with your rear cog, but it should definitely work with regard to negating chain growth, and it's cheap!
Chris |
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7




."
. I'm a bit of a weight weenie :P 

