STR | SocalTrailRiders.org
Your Southern California
Mountain Biking Community
|
|||||||
| The Workshop Get and give help on repairs, installations, maintenance, and general bike tech. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Rides a Socom
|
I think two teeth! Is this a trick question? Sorry, it's late and I am tired. No more corny jokes from me! Carry on...
![]()
__________________
Gonna get drunk don't you have no fear I want one bourbon, one scotch and one beer One bourbon, one scotch, one beer |
|
|
| post thanked by: |
bobzrag (05-28-2008)
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Single Track Mind
![]() |
I usually never shift into that last cog, but when it gets steep, that 34t helps to spin through some tuff, steep, technical sections. But if you haven't already been used to it, then I don't see the difference. A 32t will do. All the other cogs are different as well. For example:
Shimano XT-770 & Sram PG-990 11-32: 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32 11-34: 11, 13, 15, 17, 20, 23, 26, 30, 34 I'm using the Sram PG-990 11-34 |
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Intensive!
|
Lower gearing when in the granny ring with a bigger jump from your 2nd biggest to biggest cog(30t-34t I believe).A little more chain sag/slap when in large chainring and 11t cog.At my age I like the 34t to make that last grunt up a particularly tough uphill section,otherwise I do ok most of the time in the second or third cog.- Lloyd
__________________
Damn,gunna need a lot of stitches for this one.
|
|
|
| post thanked by: |
destroyer (05-28-2008),
genusmtbkr5 (05-28-2008)
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
|
Gear ratios are a little closer for the 11-32 on the tall side of the gears. That's about it. I use a SRAM 980 11-34, and I use all of them. If I bought something used and it had an 11-32, I'd still use it, humans are good at adapting to change.
__________________
You misunderstood.... I need the screwdriver not for myself but to loosen a few screws of those around me so I can fit in! ![]() Kanga "Never open a can of worms, unless you are going fishing" |
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
STR Veteran
|
11-32 Pros
-slightly tighter shifting -slightly stiffer stronger granny gear -slightly lighter weight 11-34 Pros -lower gear ratio |
|
|
| post thanked by: |
Keith B (05-28-2008),
mtnbikerfred (05-28-2008),
Piranha (05-29-2008),
Shu (05-28-2008),
TrailJesus (05-28-2008)
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Shrek must be destroyed
|
34 vs 32....
all i know is a 34 is required on a 29er LOL
__________________
-Aaron or Chewy 08 VOODOO Canzo 29er 08 Santa Cruz NOMAD "Dude, this brings back memories of the gay bar I went to!" - Rockinthecasbah |
|
|
| post thanked by: |
Pho'dUp (05-28-2008)
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
STR Veteran
|
My hardtail has 11-32
My Full Suspension has 11-34 The difference is very slight. It all comes down to personal preference. If you ride often and are pretty strong on the bike, then the 11-32 will be fine. However, if you get out once a week or climb extreme grades you'll probably want the 11-34. I stressed about the same thing when I was replacing my cassettes, but decided to stick with what came with the bike. |
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Old School BMXer
|
Quote:
The 32 and 34 big cogs are the least of my interests here! If I'm running a 32 up front, I want that 11-32, and if I'm using a 34 up front I want the 11-34. This has nothing to do with the front chainring matching the big cog, though. A 2:1 ratio is perfect for sprints and attacks (toward jumps). Any lower and I'm spinning and any higher and it's too tall. Yes, I know what I like. When riding aggressively, where I'm doing lots of sprints, I prefer to run a 2:1 ratio: The 11-32 has that 16 right there in the middle that offers a 2:1 ratio when used with a 32. The 11-34 has that 17 right there in the middle that offers a 2:1 ratio whne used with a 34. And just as you'd expect, my all mountain bike has a 36 up front, so you can bet that I'm running an 11-32, to get that 2:1 ratio with that 18 in the back. Another benefit to the 11-32 is again the 18 used with a 32 up front. This is the same gearing I run on my singlespeed. The 12-34 cassette offers other benifits in some applications. Chosing the right cassette is one the most important aspects in bike setup.
__________________
Speed has never killed anyone, suddenly becoming stationary... that's what gets you. May the air be filled with tires! |
|
|
|
| post thanked by: |
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Member
|
My bike came with a XTR 11-32 and I switched it out for a SRAM 990 11-34.
Please take into consideration that I'm a svelt 240lbs. Felt that I needed a slightly lower gearing to help me clear some steeper technical terrain while in the granny gear. I've noticed that the 34 also helped me push a lower gear in my middle chainring while climbing fire roads. The difference I feel is mostly in the two lowest gearing combinations. This fine tuned my bike to the type of gearing I need for the type of terrain I ride. I would suggest the SRAM over the XTR in two ways. One to me the shifting feels crisper (word?) Two it's about a third of the cost of a XTR. $75 vs. $215. It's hard to justify the extra cash for a few grams. Go check out The Path bike shop take off section to see if they have any cog sets that may work for you. |
|
|
| post thanked by: |
Shu (05-28-2008)
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Small, but Mighty
|
I rode and raced on a 7-speed 11-30 cassette for years until I bought a bike that came with an 11-34 9-spd. I shift more and find myself in the middle ring much more often. That's about it.
I can't imagine the difference between a 32 and 34 tooth cog being noticeable.
__________________
L8 APEKS: "Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups." Swim, bike, run. www.zippyathlete.blogspot.com |
|
|
| post thanked by: |
Pho'dUp (05-28-2008)
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Today: Sally O'Malley
|
Quote:
MTBers come all different combinations of size, skill level and fitness levels. Good, bad or otherwise, I'm 6'5", 270lbs and I'll turn 50 this year. I ride a 6" travel bike with 2.5" tires that weighs 35lbs and I like it. I run a 2x9 setup with 20/32 on the cranks and an 11/34 cassette. If it weren't for that 20t granny gear (horror of horrors, yes, I said 20t), I'd be walking many of those climbs. 20/34 is the ONLY thing that matters TO ME, the rest of the gear combos I have available are just details. To each their own. Love the bike you ride. |
|
|
|
| post thanked by: |
1080P (05-30-2008),
2wheel_lee (05-28-2008),
denmother (05-28-2008),
Johnny Dirt (05-29-2008),
L8 APEKS (05-28-2008),
ransom (05-28-2008),
Shu (05-28-2008),
Zippy (05-28-2008)
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| post thanked by: |
2wheel_lee (05-28-2008),
denmother (05-28-2008),
jeffj (05-28-2008),
L8 APEKS (05-28-2008),
Zippy (05-28-2008)
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
cookie monsta
|
Here's my easy answer to the OP:
If you race XC and climb a lot, then you may not need the 34, depending on where you ride. If you're more of an occasional trail rider, don't race or don't hang with the racers on climbs on group rides, then get the 34. |
|
|
| post thanked by: |
Shu (05-28-2008)
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
STR Moderator
![]() |
Quote:
![]()
__________________
ShinKen: OOhhh helLSS YEsS!~!!! JoeTruth: As far as I'm concerned, I could really care less. Just ride your damn bike and STFU already |
|
|
|
| post thanked by: |
Pho'dUp (05-28-2008)
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
I made a Taco this big!
![]() |
Like Zippy said, with the 34T low gear on the cassette you can stay in the middle ring more.
But, I will say, that after 6hours on the the bike climbing 22t-34t is my best farking friend.
__________________
TKBlazer: Pho'dUp forgot his clothes i guess i have to stop by the thrift store and pick him up a dress to wear for the race
|
|
|







