STR | SocalTrailRiders.org
Your Southern California
Mountain Biking Community
|
|||||||
| The Workshop Get and give help on repairs, installations, maintenance, and general bike tech. |
| View Poll Results: What's your preference? | |||
| Freehub |
|
11 | 57.89% |
| Freewheel |
|
8 | 42.11% |
| Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 (permalink) | ||
|
STR Veteran
|
Quote:
I used to be obsessed with instant engagement, but now I am not doing as much ratcheting of the cranks, and I don't care as much about engagement points. There is also reliability to consider. I feel DT, and King own this category. WI is good though. If you are thinking of Paul hubs, I would recomend White Inustries hubs instead. Quote:
Pretty close if you use the trials version, which only comes in 18T. |
||
|
|
| post thanked by: |
el_d00der1n0 (05-17-2008)
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
I aim to misbehave
|
I am most concerned with ease of maintenance and parts compatibility, especially if I am on a bike-vacation or when I used to travel to do the national series races. If you manage to break or bend a cog in the middle of west virginia, are you more likely to find a freewheel cogset or a freehub cassette at a small town bikeshop? (Note: I admit this is a geared-bike centric view... didn't realize this was primarily a SS thread)
I've never noticed or thought about "engagement lag", so I'm not sure how it affects my riding. I've never done any SS riding, so I don't know why SS'ers might be more sensitive to it than riding with gears. As for cost, I have a set of chris king hubs I bought 10 yrs ago that are still going strong. They probabaly have several thousand miles on them, and they've only been apart once for lubrication. The only problem with them is that I bought them before disc brakes were popular and I only have two bikes that are still vee-brake equiped. They might be expensive, but they'll last forever. drc |
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Hors Catégorie
|
The sweet spot in which you can effectively apply torque gets smaller as the gearing gets higher (and the slope increases). On a geared bike you just gear down. On an SS you ratchet the cranks back to recover the sweet spot. You don't want any part of the arc wasted by sloppy engagement.
|
|
|
| post thanked by: |
drclark (05-17-2008)
|
| STR sponsored links |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SS Conversion Question | Zonacat | The Workshop | 35 | 05-06-2008 09:56 PM |
| Single speed on a budget | COLEKO | The Workshop | 236 | 03-01-2008 07:19 PM |
| Industry nine wheels | Jslow | General Discussion | 57 | 01-28-2008 05:29 PM |
| a 29'er question | new2mtb | General Discussion | 60 | 08-15-2006 01:19 PM |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107






