STR | SocalTrailRiders.org
Your Southern California
Mountain Biking Community
|
|||||||
| The Workshop Get and give help on repairs, installations, maintenance, and general bike tech. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
STR Veteran
|
It looks like I'm going to build a 29er XC bike, I'm now debating QR vs TA for the fork... I'm not going to wait for the "new standard".
So the way I understand it, with QR, you get lighter weight but more flex. With TA, you get more weight, less flex. The question is, assuming I'm going to build wheels with CK hubs, what kind of weight penalty would I suffer going to TA? |
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
SLO Rider
|
personally, if I had the option i would go with a through axle. Its stiffer, more robust, not dependent on tightness of skewer etc. Its a slight weight penalty, but i think its worth it. Kind of like disk brakes being worth it despite being a bit heavier than V brakes
|
|
|
| post thanked by: |
jschwart73 (02-17-2008)
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Charlie bit me
![]() |
Really I think it's a weight thing of the rider. I get no flex at all with my QR. I've tried a few bikes with TA and can't feel a difference. I'd say stay QR unless your pushing over 180.
__________________
If quizzes are quizzical, what are tests? “Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body—but rather a skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, ‘Wow, what a ride!’ ” —anon. |
|
|
| post thanked by: |
jschwart73 (02-17-2008)
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Over the Hill
![]() |
Build it with a Hope Pro 2 hub and have it either way. It seem like MTB are moving away from QR. There is no big weight difference.
Dean
__________________
If I'm not lost or getting bushwacked, the trail was too easy. Prescott Valley Houses The Path |
|
|
| post thanked by: |
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Over the Hill
![]() |
Quote:
It has been discussed many times on MTBR, there is no weight penality. You can save weight if you use a ti QR...but that is a bad idea. Dean
__________________
If I'm not lost or getting bushwacked, the trail was too easy. Prescott Valley Houses The Path |
|
|
|
| post thanked by: |
jschwart73 (02-17-2008)
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
STR Veteran
|
Quote:
Thanks !! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
STR Veteran
|
I used to think the same thing, but after riding a Pike with 20mm TA and now a Fox 36, I'm sold on 20mm. Also, I only weigh 145 and was able to feel the front end not wander around on chunk. Also, fast turns, there was a more solid feel where I wouldn't have to make minute adjustments like I would have to with a 9mmQR.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Freeriding is both
|
First, I would like to clarify because there is a difference: through-axle is 20mm, but bolt on hubs, like you see on triple-clamp forks. 20mm QR is obviously a 20mm axle, but with quick-release skewers, which is what I think you are referring to.
I have an old (2003) Marzocchi 130mm Z1 with 20mm QR dropouts. My hub is a 20mm axle, but the hole fits old style skewers. So I removed the bottom plates that are bolted on the dropouts, and threw on an old Salsa rear QR skewer which, lengthwise, fits almost exactly. All the benefits of quick release with 20mm axle. And there is definitely a difference in stiffness and tracking, regardless of whether or not you huck. Don't know about the weight difference, but a 20mm axle doesn't have too much more material than 8mm. |
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
cookie monsta
|
I would cast my vote for TA - I am running the White Bros F135 on my 29er, and it tracks amazingly well and is super plush. Granted, the last fork I was on was a 2002 Judy XC, but huge difference here, I am about 180lbs FWIW. I notice the difference especially on off-camber corners, and in improved tracking when taking hits, say bouncing over a rock garden.
The only downside I see with TA is a little more hassle if you are removing the front wheel to transport your bike. It's not a big hassle, but you also need to potentially get an adapter if you use fork-mounts on your racks. |
|
|
| STR sponsored links |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Vote tommorow | Rockinthecasbah | The Pub | 29 | 02-05-2008 07:33 PM |
| Frame sizing question... | Jman | The Workshop | 9 | 11-25-2007 06:36 PM |
| Rear hub question... | gurp13 | The Workshop | 21 | 11-12-2007 08:50 AM |
| Question about Mavic rims... kind of a tech question | Stray_Bullit | General Discussion | 4 | 12-03-2006 01:48 PM |
| Sullivan Canyon Question | mdbradigan | Trailhead | 9 | 11-11-2006 10:22 PM |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7





!! 

